When a fire starts on a vessel, most cables do their job and fail with dignity — but the emergency circuits cannot afford to die. IEC 60331 is the test standard that separates cables which merely resist flame from cables which keep electricity flowing through the fire itself. It defines circuit integrity testing: the cable carries rated voltage, burns in a standardized flame with mechanical shock applied, and must keep the circuit alive for a stated duration. This guide explains the parts of IEC 60331, what the test demands, and how the mica tape construction behind it works.
IEC 60331, "Tests for electric cables under fire conditions — Circuit integrity", is a family of test methods verifying that a cable maintains electrical function during fire exposure. The current parts used in marine certification include:
IEC 60331-1: test method for fire with shock at a temperature of at least 830°C, for cables of rated voltage up to and including 0.6/1kV with overall diameter exceeding 20mm
IEC 60331-2: the same 830°C fire with shock regime for cables not exceeding 20mm in overall diameter
IEC 60331-21: the earlier 750°C fire with shock method, still referenced in many existing type approval certificates including Nippon Kaiji Kyokai and Bureau Veritas documents
IEC 60331-25: the corresponding circuit integrity procedure for optical fibre cables
The 830°C parts reflect a real compartment fire temperature, with mechanical shock applied to simulate falling debris and structural impact during the test.
The cable sample is mounted, energized at rated voltage, exposed to the specified flame temperature, and subjected to mechanical shock at defined intervals. Circuit integrity is judged by whether the cable maintains its electrical function — no fuse blowing, no circuit break — for the full stated duration, commonly 30, 60, 90 or 120 minutes. The test report states the part number, temperature, duration and cable type, and that report is the procurement evidence for fire resistant claims. DNV Type Approval TAE000050C for CJ85/NSC to CJ96/NSC, for example, references IEC 60331-1 and IEC 60331-2 testing at 830°C for 120 minutes.
The enabling technology is a mica glass tape applied over the conductor under the normal insulation. When polymer insulation softens or burns in the flame, the mica layer fuses into a continuous mineral barrier that keeps conductors separated and electrically functional at furnace temperatures. Standard fire resistant shipboard cables combine this mica system with the same halogen free, Category A flame retardant platform as their SC siblings — which is why the NSC designation covers both behaviors, as explained in our fire resistant vs flame retardant comparison.
Confusing fire resistance with flame retardance. IEC 60332 limits flame spread; IEC 60331 maintains circuit integrity during fire. Different tests, different constructions, different suffixes — SC versus NSC.
Ignoring the temperature and duration. A claim citing IEC 60331 without stating 750°C or 830°C and the minutes is incomplete. Emergency systems sized for 120 minutes fail their design basis if the cable delivers 30.
Assuming old certificates are invalid because they cite -21. The 750°C part appears in many valid type approvals issued under earlier editions; check the certificate validity dates rather than the part number alone.
Treating the test as a product rating. IEC 60331 verifies circuit integrity on the tested type and size range; it does not certify survival in every real fire scenario, and installation practice still matters.
Expecting fire resistance from standard cable. A cable without the mica system cannot meet IEC 60331 regardless of how good its flame retardance is.
Fire resistant vs flame retardant cable comparison — the core distinction in one page
IEC 60332 flame retardant test guide — the spread side of fire performance
IEC 60092 Series Guide — where fire resistance sits in shipboard cable standards
DNV Type Approval TAE000050C — NSC fire resistant power cables with IEC 60331-1/2 120 minute testing
DNV Type Approval TAE000050F — NSC fire resistant control and instrumentation cable types
Certifications & Test Reports — including BV 52351/B0 BV and NK TA24282M referencing IEC 60331 under earlier editions
Q1: What is the difference between IEC 60331-1 and IEC 60331-2?
Both test circuit integrity at a minimum 830°C with shock for cables up to 0.6/1kV. Part 1 applies to cables over 20mm overall diameter, part 2 to cables of 20mm and below.
Q2: Why do some certificates reference IEC 60331-21?
Part 21 is the earlier 750°C fire with shock method, widely used in type approvals issued under previous editions of the standard. It remains valid within those certificates' validity periods.
Q3: What does 830°C for 120 minutes mean in practice?
The cable carried rated voltage while exposed to a flame of at least 830°C with mechanical shock applied, for 120 minutes, without losing circuit integrity — simulating a real shipboard fire scenario for emergency systems.
Q4: Is mica tape the only way to achieve IEC 60331?
For polymeric insulated power and control cables, the mica glass tape barrier is the established and type tested route. Mineral insulated cables achieve survival through a different construction and live in different standard families.
Q5: How do I verify a fire resistant claim?
Request the test report naming the IEC 60331 part, temperature, duration, cable type and size range. Send your requirement through the contact page and we provide the documentation per type.
Send your emergency circuit list or cable schedule through the contact page. We confirm which circuits require IEC 60331 fire resistance, state the applicable part, temperature and duration per line, and return test report references with the quotation.
No.20# RenHe South Road,TianChang,AnHui Province,China.